Posts Tagged ‘phthalates cosmetics’

Monday November 16th, 2009 at 11:19 pm by admin

Phthalates in Cosmetics: Not Good

Did you know Phthalates are banned by the EU in children’s toys,  because of known dangers to the body, yet are still used in America in cosmetics???

The non-profit Environmental Working Group launched the Not Too Pretty campaign in 2002 to raise awareness about the dangers of phthalates, industrial chemicals that are used as solvents in many cosmetics. Most of the mainstream hair sprays, deodorants, nail polishes and perfumes that millions of people use every day contain these harmful chemicals. Phthalates are also employed as plastic softeners in many different consumer products, including children’s toys and medical devices.

Why Are Phthalates Dangerous?
Shown to damage the liver, kidneys, lungs and reproductive systems in animal studies, phthalates can be absorbed through the skin or inhaled. Scientists at government agencies in both the U.S. and Canada agree that exposure to the chemicals could cause a wide range of health and reproductive problems in people.

Manufacturers use phthalates because they cling to the skin and nails to give perfumes, hair gels and nail polishes more staying power. But a recent study by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) found that five percent of women between age 20 and 40 had up to 45 times more phthalates in their bodies than researchers initially hypothesized. CDC found phthalates in virtually every person tested, but the largest concentrations — 20 times higher than the rest of the population — were found in women of child-bearing age. Meanwhile, another study, led by Dr. Shanna Swan of the University of Missouri, identified developmental abnormalities in male infants correlating to high phthalate levels in their mothers’ bodies.

Industry Group Denies Risk
Meanwhile, the industry-backed Phthalate Information Center asserts, “There is no reliable evidence that any phthalate has ever caused a health problem for a human from its intended use.” The group accuses organizations of “cherry picking” results “showing impacts on test animals to create unwarranted concern about these products.” But EWG spokesperson Lauren E. Sucher urges people — especially women who are pregnant, nursing or planning on becoming pregnant — to avoid phthalates. EWG is planning free online access to its “Skin Deep” database, which will list lotions, creams and polishes that contain phthalates.

Banned in Europe, Not U.S. or Canada
A 2003 European Union directive bans phthalates in cosmetics sold in Europe, but U.S. and Canadian regulators have not been so proactive, despite mounting evidence of potential harm. Health advocates were temporarily relieved when the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) announced that it would begin enforcing a 1975 law requiring labels on products with ingredients that haven’t been safety tested. But such labels remain to be seen, even though 99 percent of cosmetics contain one or more untested ingredients.

Monday October 19th, 2009 at 9:14 am by admin

Chemicals in Cosmetics: Should You Be Worried?

Christopher Drummond Beauty is proud to use only healthy and enhancing ingredients in our cosmetics and packaging.  You can use our high quality products with a sound mind.  We are here to look out for your health.  For more information, click here

A new survey of scientific evidence conducted by researchers working with the Breast Cancer Fund makes a persuasive case that the industrialized world’s rising breast cancer rate may stem from exposure to radiation and chemicals in plastics, pesticides, cosmetics and other common household goods.SOE 2008 cover_lg.jpg

“Increasingly sophisticated and compelling data link radiation and various chemicals in our environment to the current high rates of breast cancer incidence,” says the study, “State of the Evidence – The Connection Between Breast Cancer and the Environment,” published in the February issue of the International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Health.

The bottom line, says Vassar College researcher Janet Gray, who led the survey team, is that “we should be concerned about the accumulated set of chemicals to which we are being exposed and to which our children are being exposed.”

In a companion article, a team lead by Janet Nudelman, Director of Program and Policy at the Breast Cancer Fund, recommends a set of policy initiatives, among them, an overhaul and strengthening of federal laws that aim to limit human exposure to toxic industrial chemicals and pesticides.

The report targeted so-called “endocrine-disrupting” chemicals that cause changes in the body’s hormones. The Breast Cancer Fund is calling for immediate comprehensive bans on two endocrine-disrupting chemicals that are essential building blocks of a host of plastic products:
*Bisphenol A (BPA), a synthetic estrogen and building block of polycarbonate plastics and epoxy resin, associated with damage to the brain, neurological system and reproductive system of lab animals.

*Phthalates, used as solvents and as “plasticizers” to make plastics like polyvinyl chloride (PVC) more flexible and resilient. Phthalates have been shown to cause abnormalities in male reproductive systems.

A federal ban on phthalates in toys, teethers, bibs and other children’s products takes effect tomorrow (February 10, 2009). Similarly, some lawmakers favor banning BPA from children’s products or food contact items.

But Nudelman says those measures are an important first step but don’t go far enough, pointing out that both chemicals are in a vast variety of products that can leach toxins into people and the environment. “BPA and phthalates are so powerful, they can actually cross the placenta and impact the fetus in development and predispose the fetus to cancer and other diseases,” she says. “If they can cross the placenta and affect fetal development, they have no business being in commerce, period.”

“The picture of breast cancer causation that emerges is complex,” said Breast Cancer Fund president Jeanne Rizzo. “While there is no single smoking gun, the trends that emerge lead us to stop asking IF there is a link between breast cancer and synthetic chemicals, and to instead ask how to act to reduce our exposure, given the strong and compelling evidence we now have.”